Congratulations to the Pechersk District Court of Kiev on April 18, 2016, the Main Directorate of the General Prosecutor's Office is conducting pre-trial investigations into criminal offenses No. 42015000000001200 dated 06/19/2015 for the fact that the mine of PJSC “KB “Nadra”” was assigned to the path of an evil service camp, for the signs of criminal offenses, transferred to Part 5 of Art. 191 CC of Ukraine.
“During the hour of pre-trial investigation, it was established that during 2014, officials of PJSC CB Nadra withdrew loans from the National Bank of Ukraine to save liquidity for a total amount of 3,3 billion UAH.
Subsequently, following the ongoing actions on the side, the bank was taken care of, thereby bringing the bank to the category of non-paying bank during the first quarter of 2015 through the process of crushing the deposits of individuals and removing funds legal entities, the bank's loan portfolio was changed to a total amount of more than UAH 8 billion. and 1 billion US dollars.
Based on the results of such activities, on 02/05/2015 the bank was declared non-payable by the resolution of the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine No. 83. By Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine No. 356 dated 06/04/2015, a banking license was granted and a decision was made on the liquidation of PJSC CB Nadra. The reason for bankruptcy is the bank’s undercapitalization, due to possible stress testing, and failure to bring its activities in line with the proper legislation,” the document states.
It is also stated that “during the pre-trial investigation, the investigators realized the need to conduct additional interviews with numerous employees of the safe warehouse of PAT “KB “Nadra””, who had returned from the troubles before the NBU about revocation of the loan to preserve liquidity, as well as other bank officials who were prepared to provide extensive and additional materials to the new ones, but it does not seem possible to obtain them from the procedure established by law, leaving pre-trial investigation authority "Daily addresses, mobile phone numbers and other necessary information to contact you for additional service details."
“Special bank statements are stored at the office of PJSC CB Nadra. Doctors who can only remove copies of documents unless the court grants timely access to them, otherwise it is impossible to remove the specified copies of documents, so you must ask the next court to grant timely access to the documents if possible. the acquisition of their copies,” is to be praised by the court.
The investigators asked for access to special certificates, employees, the head of the Nadra bank, members of the board, the chief accountant, and senior executives of independent structural divisions of the bank.
The court was clearly pleased with the fuss.
Довідка Finbalance:
Read also: The Prosecutor General's Office is investigating the loss of 30 billion rubles by Nadra Bank.
As written by Finbalance, the General Prosecutor's Office has uncovered criminal activity due to suspicious transactions of the Nadra Bank on the basis of the publication of our publication dated 07 June 2015 to the fate of “NBU not comments on the withdrawal of billions of hryvnias from the Nadra bank before liquidation.”
We are not ready to say for certain that in both cases we are talking about the same criminal activities. Please note, the nickname of the investigator of the GPU, who was involved in the publication of Finbalance, does not appear in the letter of praise to the Pechersk District Court (the nicknames of other investigators are indicated there).
At the same time, in the court’s praise, it was sent to the data, as suggested by our observation that in the first quarter of 2015, the amount of hryvnia loans to legal entities in the portfolio of Nadra Bank changed by 6,86 billion UAH, and foreign exchange positions – by 238,7 million dollars; obligations of foreign currency loans to individuals - by 836 million dollars, hryvnia - by 1,33 billion UAH.
At the same time, we pointed out that the total amount of foreign currency deposits of Yurosib at Bank Nadra in the first quarter of 2015 changed 92 times - from a maximum of 167 million dollars to 1,8 million dollars (which fell by 165,2 million dollars), and the portfolio of hryvnia deposits decreased to a maximum of 5 times – from UAH 2,76 billion to UAH 566 million (that is, by UAH 2,2 billion). At the same time, the portfolio of hryvnia deposits in fizosib at Nadra Bank in the first quarter of 2015 increased by UAH 127 million.
What were the reasons for such dynamics of the loan and deposit portfolio? Assignment of rights to Vimoga? Could the “collapse” break the bank? Statistical “cleaning” of the size of the loan portfolio for the change in the amount of reserves that would be formed under the subordinate positions? What's different?... Similar to those that GPU investigators are trying to get out of this.
We remember that the head of the board of Nadra Bank is Dmitro Zinkov. According to the data of the National Center for Financial Markets and Financial Markets, the payment was made on 02/04/2015 - one day before the Nadra Bank was declared non-payable (Vyacheslav Avramenka was also appointed as the acting head of the board). I also have great respect for the fact that the report to Nadra Bank for the fourth quarter of 2014 was signed by Tetyana Kononova.
On the website of Nadra Bank it is stated that D. Zinkov was a member of the governing board of the financial institution
— Domuz Olena Oleksandrivna, director of business management;
— Sergiy Oleksandrovich Kozlov, director of distribution business;
— Kononova Tetyana Danilivna, director of corporate business;
— Serdunich Kostyantin Volodimirovich, financial director;
— Natalia Andriivna Shelko, Director of Operations and Information Technologies.
According to NBU data, as of January 1, 2016, D. Zinkov was the owner of 8,22% of the shares of Platinum Bank. Last year, D. Zinkov became the head of the board of “Platinum Bank”, but judging from this, the NBU did not notice the obvious recognition of the relationship between the borrowing of important settlements from banks by ex-top managers of bankrupt financial institutions.
I have a terrible respect for such a situation.
The food is to blame: since there are suspicions of large-scale fraud at the Nadra bank, why should the Prosecutor General’s Office rely only on hired spy agents, let alone top management? The incredibly shady billionaire transactions could have been carried out at least without the participation (or even direct deposits) of the majority shareholder - Dmitry Firtash and/or "observers", zokrem, from Group DF (whose representatives were part of the financial council)?
It’s almost impossible to believe it, as it seems.
This cannot but be obvious to investigators of the Prosecutor General’s Office.
However, for such a statement, political will is required - it is clear that it is not the investigators themselves, but the government of the GPU and the government of the state.
Before the speech, in the chest, the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Arsen Avakov, stated that the National Police had begun to investigate the fact that the NBU was investigating the failure to repay a loan refinanced by Nadra Bank from the amount of 5 billion UAH, seized under the special guarantee of Dmitry Firtash.
According to the words of A. Avakov, D. Firtash is suspected of manipulating a special guarantee in the amount of up to 5 billion hryvnia, by organizing the withdrawal of a loan from the NBU for refinancing the Nadra bank, and without ensuring the viability of this costs to stabilize the situation, and at the same time – to keep them in the company associated with him.
As of April 06, 2015, the Nadra bank owed UAH 12,6 billion to the NBU, and perhaps half of all financial claims were due. Thus, the bulk of Nadra’s credit debt to the regulator accumulated in 2008-2009. In November 2014, the NBU issued stabilization loans to the authorized financial institutions in the amount of UAH 1,5 billion (under the protection of corporate rights and mining rights behind loan agreements). The city again has stabilization loans of 1 billion, as well as provisions for saving liquidity of 300 million UAH. In birch - 500 million UAH to preserve liquidity.
1,5 billion + 1 billion UAH + 0,8 billion UAH = 3,3 billion UAH, as the GPU investigators guess.
PS According to the data of the Guarantee Fund, as of April 01, 2016, depositors of Nadra Bank received compensation within the guarantee amount of UAH 3,59 billion. (93,0% of the amount that extends the payment).
Apparently, compensation to depositors of bankrupt banks is important for the management of equity assets - loans from the NBU for the Fund and the position of the Ministry of Finance, which issues government bonds (OVDP), and The National Bank monetizes them. What, in its turn, affects the exchange rate (provokes devaluation) and prices (provokes the rise of inflation).
Subscribe to our channels in Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, VC — Only new faces from the section CRYPT!