Agroholding "Mriya"
"Mriya" - one of the largest Ukrainian agricultural holdings, which recently announced a technical default - is suspected of evasive tax payments.
In search of additional information, the EP poured out praise for the Romanivsky District Court of the Zhytomyr region, as they say about this.
These documents are freely available in the Unified State Register of Ship Decisions.
Praise the court dated 18 June 2014.
Episode one. "Rytolis"
With his praises, the district court satisfied the efforts of investigators to obtain information from the tax and statutory documents of low-level enterprises that are part of the structure of the agricultural holding "Mriya". The law enforcement authorities requested additional documents as part of the collapsed criminal investigation.
Learn about the following companies: “Romaniv-agro”, “Romaniv-agrokom”, “Saturn agro” and “UPT”. All the stench belongs to the agricultural holding. Their founders are TOV "Group of Companies" Mriya Agro" and TOV "Mriya AgroHolding", which lead most of the companies in the holding.
In the current investigation, it is clear that in 2013, Mriya Agroholding, in addition to the partnerships involved in law enforcement, made fictitious total losses in the amount of over 1 million UAH.
During the investigation, investigators also established that the group of companies "Mriya Agro" and "Mriya AgroHolding" are the founders of LLC "Ritolis".
Apparently, the minimization of enterprise income through the individual protection of gross expenditures is one of the most extensive “schemes” of subsidy evasion. For its implementation, fictitious enterprises are necessary, for example, “fake” employees.
Calling such companies a “buffer”, the money can be withdrawn from the conversion centers and converted into cooking. “Rytolis” seems to have ended this role.
TOV was founded in 2013. Statutory fund - 1 thousand UAH. At the same time, according to court decisions, the enterprise declared 71 million UAH in gross income in 2013. What should I do?
According to the data of the DP “Information Resource Center”, the main type of activity of LLC “Ritolis” is grain processing and production. Prote in the profile databases is nowhere to be found, and the Zhytomyr agricultural website is stunned by the accusation. Since June 16, 2014, TOV has been in business.
The head of the enterprise, according to the Unified State Register, is Andriy Kovalchuk. Nothing is known about this person either. Investigators in their troubles call this person “a fictitious person,” as TOV registered “unidentified persons.”
“This type has specific physical characteristics. This is not “Mriya Agro” and “Mriya Agroholding”, however, these individuals can be involved in the knowledge of companies, for example, activities in their interests or as spy agents of these partnerships,” - even a representative of law enforcement agencies, such as The EP asked to decipher the information in praise.
I'm sorry, in praise of the Romanivsky court, it is not clear how "Mriya" is connected with the LLC "Ritolis", and on what grounds the court allowed the investigators to access the documents of the agricultural holding. The Mriya press service also did not explain this. The river workers did not provide food to the holding company.
The episode is different. "Convert"
As has already been stated, there is little information about Ritolis LLC. The most information about the “gasket” can only be found in ship’s affairs. Here, respectfully, I praised the court on June 9, 2014 about the satisfaction of yet another labor of investigation to verify two banks and low enterprises.
Here the “Mriya” enterprises are no longer recognizable. The document states that during 2013-2014, approximately UAH 130 million was reinsured from the assets of Ritolis LLC to six questionable companies.
Moreover, the “gasket” took 71 million UAH at the end of 2013 as a loan and sent it to the named companies on the same day. During 2014, the same sum was overinsurance for only one of these companies - Torgoptdevelopment LLC.
“The businesses are actually located at the same address, and their banking accounts are open to PJSC CB Khreshchatyk and PJSC Divy Bank.” The stench reveals signs of fictitiousness. “It’s clear that through them the money is taken from the storage bins and converted into food,” says the praise.
This enterprise has a small statutory fund - about 1 thousand UAH. The larger price is available from LLC "TRK-7" - 61 thousand UAH.
This way, based on public data, there are only three companies associated with one address. About five of them are registered in Luhansk region. All stinks, like “Ritolis”, have been registered recently and are currently in use. Their activities have already been liquidated.
On the right are banks, through which the mysterious operations were carried out. The first is “Khreshchatyk” of Ukrainian businessmen Vasyl Khmelnytsky and Igor Dvoretsky, a great leader of the Zaporizhstal iron and steel plant.
The other - “Diva Bank” - belongs to the Gutiv family, whose members are the leaders of the agricultural holding “Mriya”. Ivan, Klavdia, Andriy and Mykola Guti opened a bank in 2011. Just forget that Volodya is the remaining bank, such “slimy” operations cannot but interfere with the security services of financial institutions.
Based on this information, both banks are candidates for reduced licenses. Or, let’s face it, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the National Bank will be affected by their activities.
Over the past few months, the heads of the NBU and the State Fiscal Service have repeatedly talked about the fight against “conversion” centers-banks. Meanwhile, the obitsyanki, called porushniki, have become deprived of obitsyanki.
Thus, at the end of the year, the current NBU chief Stepan Kubiv stated that during the recheck, the regulator identified 12 banks that played the role of conversion centers, and through these banks “withdrew” 142 billion UAH.
This year, the Prosecutor General’s Office made a statement about the violation of the hierarchical structure of the persistently evil organization. The same intercessor of the Prosecutor General Mykola Golomsha boasted that the SBU, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the NBU have identified 14 such financial institutions.
The current National Bank has confirmed that it is fighting against “envelopes” and has reported that three such centers have been identified. Were the organizers punished? Nutrition is more rhetorical.
Instead of a conclusion
Information was collected from the fortune tellers, which was removed during the pre-trial investigation. There may be evidentiary significance, but not at this stage. The conclusion of the decision is all the same, the court is making it, as far as the right goes. Those who complain and blame the companies “Mriya Agroholding” and “Mriya Agro”, which appear here.
The praise contained information that indirectly pointed to the guilt of the holding. However, there is no clear confirmation of the connection between “Rytolis” and “Mriya”.
Apparently, the holding is experiencing serious financial difficulties. In September 2014, “Mriya” announced a technical default. The company's debt was set at $1,3 billion, and the Vlasniks urged creditors to write off $900 million.
According to the Unified Register of Ship Decisions, the banks “Credit Agricole”, “Joint-Stock Commercial Industrial and Investment Bank”, “Credit Europe Bank”, Diamantabank and FUIB are being sought to be brought against the companies in the courts.
In addition, leasing companies “OTP-Leasing”, “Raiffeisen Leasing Aval” and “Ukrainian Leasing Fund” are trying to judge Mriya’s equipment.
A new international committee of creditors and minority shareholders of Mriya has returned to Ukrainian authorities to investigate the activities of the company and its family. Gutiv, who controls the agricultural holding. Lenders addressed the donations to the president, prime minister, NBU, SBU, Prosecutor General's Office and the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
Often creditors and company owners are trying to figure out how to get out of the crisis situation.
Rostislav Kravets, senior partner of the legal company “Kravets and Partners”
— Large enterprises are still profiting from similar schemes to minimize taxes. Foreign companies may be the culprit. There is nothing wonderful about him. It’s amazing that this praise was wasted on free access. This is wrong.
Varto pay special attention to the formulation, which is necessary for the document. It’s a good idea to attract a connection between an agricultural holding and a “fictitious” company.
In one part it is stated that the holding is the founder of a fictitious enterprise, in the other part it is an individual. Such a connection is more likely to indicate falsification.
It is unclear why the Romanivsky District Court is dealing with these issues, if they are going to deny access to documents from the Novograd-Volinsky Department of the State Department of the Ministry of Revenue. Whose judge and these investigators need to be brought together to the point of authenticity. This is more similar to the “attack” of a subordinate character.
Dmitro Denkov, Economic Truth
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, Facebook , Twitter , VK - Only new faces from the SKLEP section!