The appointment of Major General Dublyk and Colonel Neskoromny to senior positions in the Security Service will inevitably weaken the Ukrainian intelligence agency and will be another "setup" by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's advisers. This was stated by Volodymyr Omelchuk, Secretary of the Public Council for the Renewal of the Security Service of Ukraine (2016-2017).
As reported Tsenzor.NET Citing sources in the Office of the President, it is proposed to appoint Major General Anatoly Dublik to the position of deputy chairman overseeing the national statehood protection unit. It is proposed to appoint Dmitry Neskoromny to the position of deputy chairman overseeing the investigation.
According to Omelchuk, Major General Anatoly Dublyk is remembered by Ukrainian society for the so-called "Shatun" plan.
"The 'Shatun' plan, announced by Anatoliy Dublyk, head of the SBU's Department for the Protection of National Statehood, at a press conference on November 11, 2016, was dismissed as a fabrication and an attempt by officials of the SBU's 'political' department to use discrediting channels to undermine the actions of anti-presidential political forces and civic movements. Numerous politicians and security analysts have spoken out about the possible fabrication of the 'Shatun' plan. In fact, according to law enforcement sources, information from documents seized by the SBU during searches as part of a criminal investigation into separatist movements in Transcarpathia was extrapolated without any basis to all of Ukraine," he stated.
According to Omelchuk, the authorities needed to fight public protests, “so their loyal gendarme came up with whatever he could.”
"The next reason that calls into question Major General Dublyk's ability to not only lead the special services, but even serve in the military at all, is his alcohol abuse. Back on August 18, 2016, the Public Council on the Renewal of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) wrote to Security Service Head Gritsak requesting Dublyk's removal from his position for alcohol abuse," he noted.
Regarding Dmitry Neskoromny, Omelchuk noted that his name actually became known to Ukrainian society due to the resonance surrounding the so-called "diamond prosecutors" case.
"In late 2016 and February 2017, former Deputy Head of the Security Service of Ukraine Viktor Trepak publicly announced that the SBU was firing employees involved in the special operation to detain the 'diamond prosecutors,' including Dmytro Neskoromny. The Public Council on Security Service Renewal, of which I was Secretary in 2016-2017, conducted an investigation into the issue raised by Trepak, as it was one of the council's direct functions. We concluded that claims by some individuals about SBU 'cleansing' SBU employees involved in the 'diamond prosecutors' case were untrue," Omelchuk emphasized.
The Public Council on the Renewal of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) then received information that Colonel Neskoromny headed a group within the SBU that carried out operational support for Maidan events and was supposed to carry out orders from the Prosecutor General's Office (GPU) Department, which was headed by Gorbatyuk.
"As a representative of civil society, I was deeply upset to learn that Colonel Neskoromny, expecting the Party of Regions to return to power soon, hadn't signed a single order to investigate crimes against the Maidan. SBU Chairman Vasyl Hrytsak brought Dmytro Neskoromny into custody not in the "diamond prosecutors" case, which failed in part due to Neskoromny's "professionalism" (his subordinates pressured the court, which retroactively authorized searches of the homes of prosecutors Korniyets and Shapakin), but specifically because of his attitude toward the Maidan cases," Omelchuk emphasized.
Maxim Saenko, Anticorrosive
Subscribe to our channels in Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, VC — Only new faces from the section CRYPT!