The Kiev Administrative Court of Appeal is considering the appeal of the NBU against the decision of the District Administrative Court of Kiev, which, on the 25th of June, satisfied the demands of the Mykhailivsky Bank and asked for the NBU's order 09/08/2015 No. 502-r “On carrying out a scheduled visa check of PJSC “Bank Mikhailovsky”.
As stated in the materials of the certificate, the reconsideration of the small supply of food to the market participant was due to legislation in the sphere of financial monitoring and to the currency legislation. The period of activity that extends the revolution from 01 September to 04 June 2015. The Oscar order was signed by the first intercessor of the head of the NBU, Pisaruk O.V.
Bank "Mykhailivsky" announced its call because, in its opinion, the order was adopted due to violations of the Regulations on the procedure for organizing and carrying out food inspections and against legalization (disposal) of income acquired by the evil way, financing of terrorism and financing of the widespread expansion of mass poverty, approved by the decree of the NBU board dated June 20, 2011 No. 197, as a result of the re-verification assigned for daily use Substitute the values using the predicted order. In addition, the positive person indicated that the order was transferred to the verification of these same supplies and for the very period for which PJSC “Bank Mikhailivsky” had already been verified.
The authority of the NBU stated that the disqualified order was accepted as a result (on the basis) of an independent review of financial monitoring, documents and information from structural units of the National Bank about the violations positively legislation on financial monitoring.
The resolution of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kiev stated that the order to the National Bank “to take revenge on the illegal norms” of its regulatory legal acts was disapproved of, “and not to take revenge on the basis for carrying out the verification.” Dali - quote.
“The [NBU] statement, as a basis for validating the verification of the positive deposit, is sent to an additional note from the director of the financial monitoring department of the National Bank of Ukraine and indicates that the verification of the positive deposit is assigned to the result of the uncredited at a glance from the nutrition of financial monitoring, as well as documents and information from structural units of the National Bank of Ukraine about the violation of legislation in relation to financial monitoring.
Proceeding from the disqualification of the order, do not misplace the order on the indicated facts and materials, and then confirm the positive result, so that the disqualification does not transfer the place for carrying out the verification and transfer of food, which facilitates the verification of it. primed.
In addition, from the materials the certificate is drawn up, so that on the stand the authorization to carry out a planned comprehensive audit of PJSC “Bank Mikhailovsky” dated 08/07/2015 No. 25-03001/55885 for the period From 12.08.2015 to 31.08.2015, a planned comprehensive review of PJSC “Bank Mikhailovsky” was carried out in accordance with the Bank’s compliance with currency legislation and regulations of the National Bank of Ukraine for the period from 06.21.2013 to 07/31/2015
Also, the disapproved orders regarding the re-verification of currency legislation for the period from 01/01/2015 to 07/31/2015 were assigned a re-verification of these same supplies for the same period, which were the subject of a planned re-verification carried out on submitting an agreement to carry out a planned comprehensive audit of PJSC “Bank Mikhailivsky” dated 08/07/2015 No. 25-03001/55885, which indicates a violation of paragraph 2.15 of Procedure 338, which directly re-verification was blocked for the same period, the same foods that were the subject of the previous revision.
According to the opinion of the District Administrative Court of Kiev, the legality of the disgraced order in connection with the requirements of part 19 of the Constitution of Ukraine and part three has not been established Article 2 of the Code of Administrative Judiciary of Ukraine, and based on the systemic analysis of the provisions of the legislation of Ukraine and the evidence found in the documents, the administrative position of PJSC “Bank Mykhailivsky” is satisfied,” - was in the court order від 25 вересня.
As Finbalance wrote, the majority owner of the Mykhailivsky bank is V. Polishchuk - owner of the Technopolis border, Guliver shopping center.
According to ZMI, that people's deputies, his squad is the niece of the squad of Russian Prime Minister Dmitr Medvedev.
The press also connected with the Mykhailivsky Bank, incl. with the ex-Minister of Revenue and Collections O. Klimenko, although they stood up in the very end of the fiscal year.
V. Polischuk’s company “Ecosipan” wanted to add to the “All-Ukrainian Bank for Development” (a time-hour administration was introduced at this financial institution), the 100-hundredth ruler of which is Yanukovych’s son Oleksandr.
Subscribe to our channels in Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, VC — Only new faces from the section CRYPT!