Until recently, Sergei Pivnyuk was in charge of all the region's stinks. At least, that's what Google says, as when Pivnyuk, the environmental prosecutor, is mentioned, he only returns pages about how and where he conquered the stink.
However, Pivnyuk has also been implicated in other matters.
SBUSHNO-Prosecutor's Svaville, or safari in Vinnytsia.
For the sake of fairness, it is clear that the first instance court of appeal of the Vinnytsia region court ruled, and the prosecutor’s office of the Vinnytsia region responded to the application of Yu. Levchenko on January 23, 2008 The decree about “closing the criminal investigation” against the townspeople on behalf of A. Tkhorovsky was imposed and a pre-trial investigation was organized, so that it could be taken under control. However, from these times (that is, a stretch of two fates), there is no information about the progress of the results of this investigation, not depending on the official numbers of the applicants and victims.
Well, it’s important to understand the reasons that prompted the Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region to abolish “non-powerful functions” and give an assessment of the possible offenses, the prosecutor’s office of the Vinnytsia region is no less It’s good, but it’s more possible to be timid, but to preserve the “honor of the uniform.” Although, to tell the truth, it is more problematic to understand the honor of a uniform, since it is unknown that this very uniform has become a thing of the past for “skinners”, “crishes”, inflated statistics and the organization of goods the ceremonies of the “law enforcement officers” and who lost just their panties? . As if it wasn’t there, but as a result of a second review of the document, the Staromisky District Court of Vinnytsia made a statement about the fact that the “Chekists” made an inaccuracy and inconsistency in the investigation, which cannot be included in the court hearing, and that right should be sent to the regional prosecutor's office to organize additional investigation. However, the deputy prosecutor of the Staromisky district of the city of Vinnytsia, Serhiy Pivnyuk, entered into the life line “according to his uniform”, as a sovereign prosecutor, filing an appeal about the misfortune of such decisions to the first court instances, and the Court of Appeal of the Vinnytsia region, under the pressure of the organizers and authorities of criminal justice, praised the direction of the appeal for a new review to the court of the first instance.
Having looked at the criminal law, the Staromisky District Court of Vinnytsia, again made a decision about those who, in some cases, are incorrectly established, and in other cases, the norms of civil law are clearly not established law, criminal procedure and criminal law, and that on the right is directed to the regional prosecutor's office to organize an additional investigation in accordance with the rules of surveillance. This additional investigation is carried out not by a special authority, but by internal law enforcement agencies, as required by the law. However, once again, Mr. Pivnyuk, who supported the accusation of three fatalities in all court hearings without guilt (more than 50), does not care about those who, as a result of the third review of criminal justice in the court of the first instance, the court did not establish the fact of the ownership of the unfinished business of the private enterprise of Mr. Samoilenko, and, as a result, rejected new evidence of the lack of authority of such an assignment, and the conclusion of the rejection of the additions "from above" filing an appeal again to the appeal court of the Vinnytsia region with a strong claim to challenge the decision of the local court and send a right to a new judicial review at the same court. In this case, Mr. Prosecutor, in the interests of Mr. Samoilenko, himself went to the extent of falsifying documents that are of an evidentiary nature.
The pressure of the organizers and Vikonavians of the criminal case, immediately on the appeal court of the Vinnytsia region, calling before the appeal court of the Vinnytsia region, Having heard neither the representative of the regional prosecutor's office, nor the judge, nor anyone else knew about the date of review of the document in the court hearing, (the summons and information about the date of the meeting were served on the day after the review of the document in the appeal judges), having found out that it was necessary satisfy the appeal of the sovereign prosecutor and send the right for a new judicial review to the court of the first instance. Regardless of this decision, the Vinnytsia District Court, which looked at the right in the fourth quarter, 06.10.2009, finally issued a ruling on the appeal to the prosecutor, having established that during the pre-trial investigation there were significant violations criminal-procedural law, which entailed the secret incorrect decisions of the investigator and the prosecutor, and thus made it impossible for an objective, comprehensive review of the court’s execution of the lawful and justified case. Moreover, the court found that these fundamental violations led to the violation of the constitutional rights of the accused guaranteed by law.
Once again, the other sovereign accuser, Mr. Oleg Ratushnyak, upholding the “glorious traditions” of his predecessor, filed a submission to the appellate authority with the aim of binding the ruling to the court and sending it to justice. for a new (fifth!?) review, go to the court of the first instance, the fragments in the ruling of the Vinnytsia court, which is not the same as the preemption of the court (??!!). And this is despite the fact that the court established facts of violation of the constitutional rights of the accused, falsification of the accused, details of evidence, a clear lack of access to the materials of hundreds of documents, which may be of real importance for establishing the truth at the right, etc. etc. !! Ignoring the norms of civil and criminal-procedural legislation on the side of such a squad of “law enforcement officers” is hostile. Is this brotherhood completely spared not only some moral and ethical standards, but also the elementary instinct of self-preservation? How much have they already become aware of their lack of karnity, that they have lost their sense of reality and have forgotten what coordinate system they are in? Therefore, in essence, these people with poor souls are trying to protect the interests of the state and under the guise of doing their dirty deeds, in the name of such actions They are “law enforcement officers” from the Kirovograd region, who ruled under the palm of their hand to kill an innocent person and kill them? How to deal with cross-border Ukrainians using more sophisticated methods...
“It’s not the court in this case,” Yuriy Afanasyovich reveals, “but the prosecutor’s office itself, in the end of every possible contradictory view of the case in court, demonstrates a proactiveness and tendency in the evaluation of the materials of the case: - itself The prosecutor's office, with obvious motives, civilly and legally, the conflict between the ruling subjects of the private form of power is assessed as a form of criminal mischief, by the prosecutor's office itself, in violation of the rules subslednosti, on the right transferred for the implementation of pre-trial investigation by a law enforcement agency of special significance, the competence of any investigation of such transactions does not come within the scope of the law, the prosecutor’s office itself will proceed in court, without regard to the presence of documents on the right of authority on the unfinished work of the reliable O. Samoilenko enterprise, the establishment of facts of service division on the side of the service characteristics of this enterprise and the use of these furnishings by them, What is entrepreneurship without being a master of the subject? dispute, it was decided on 04/02/2004 to sell the unfinished building on the street. Engelsa 35, at a price set by him, and canceling the transfer of funds under the contract in full, could possibly turn the situation around at the expense of the private enterprises owned by Samoilenko. About the proactiveness of the prosecutor's office itself against the corruption of these private enterprises and their efforts to unlawfully accept these legal entities in their current government activities, it is advisable to conduct an analysis before filing Sovereigns accuse the appeal and this data, which they prove with their super-sensitive and inconsistent reprisal”
It is characteristic that with the presentation of facts of service fragmentation and abuse of these important officials who initiated criminal law, Yuriy Levchenko repeatedly identified the power attraction of them to Apparently, however, the prosecutor's office of the Vinnytsia region, which was entrusted with the verification of these animal killings, invariably confirmed that it is “criminal on the right to be considered in court, and that food must be assessed and the legality of the collected evidence from the criminal “The right will follow the results of the court investigation.” The specific evidence for the specific supply of food, and the prosecutor’s authorities respect the facts of falsification and the creation of individual evidence, either legal or illegal Yuriy Levchenko. Having failed to achieve several losses, these losses are deprived of respect not only by the prosecutor's office of the Vinnytsia region, which is trying to obtain the conviction of the lieutenant colonel from the representative office, and from the General Prosecutor's Office at any cost. Ukraine. At the same time, transferring to the court the responsibility for the failure of the prosecutor to resolve the shortcomings that led to the derogation of the right of the accused, guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine, to protect himself from the charge brought against him, the regional prosecutor’s office is intervening due to their actions, the violation of the rights of the accused, threatening to transfer him to court. It is now possible to confirm that the court’s decision of the residual decision of the justice, remains a violation of Levchenko’s right to a fair trial in terms of the reasonableness of the lines (maybe the consequences) of the view (Part 1 of Article 6 of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights). fundamental freedoms), which the prosecutor’s office itself now calls a ship’s drag. Father, bring the European Court of Human Rights to justice.
On the other hand, a new (fifth) review of the case in the court of the first instance, for the prosecutor’s failure to reject the interpretations in the decision of the Vinnytsia District Court dated 10/06/2009 as a violation of a criminal procedural nature, as, as the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine indicated in the 2006 year, “it is impossible to accept the residual legal decision” and the continuation of the unlawful incorporation by the prosecutor’s office of the private enterprise “Podillya - Bud” created by him government activity, does not provide a guarantee of the prevention of other violations of human rights, except for Article 7 of the Convention, as follows from Part 2 of Art. 58 of the Constitution of Ukraine and Part 3 of Art. 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine approves the fundamental criminal law principle of “No punishment without the Law.” So who is the prosecutor's office kidnapping? THE LAW, what is the “honor of the uniform”, how many officers of the SBU Department in the Vinnytsia region who saved a falsified certificate before the trial and forced the arrest of their colleague? These great people, before speaking, have undoubtedly retired with honors and are busy with their dear hearts on the right: General Kulak is planting decorative bushes on his template and is actively awakening the regional center of the huge society “Strength and Honor”, Colonel Malinovsky is collapsing the creation of “backbreaking labor” power business, and the middle-aged Viconavians of the falsified record continue to rise in ranks: becoming a lieutenant colonel and becoming a commander of the KZE Igor Sosnovsky, having reached the rank of captain Yulian Migaenko, and the head of the surveillance unit Sergiy Pugach, without depriving him of the rank of colonel, otherwise, as “knowledgeable people” think, the minds of “stifling” the guards will “long be” and secretly, first of all, young spivorobnitniks of the Ukrainian State Security Service near the Vinnytsia region, who are determined to seize living space, especially for themselves a 3-room apartment, for which the shareholders They didn’t give any kind of companionship. The talk about the need to promote a unified coordinated anti-corruption policy, the formation in the state of a clear and well-groomed government of nobles in the face of such a social phenomenon as corruption, has already become boring. Without specific actions, “dental attack” will turn into scurvy. First of all, the reasons for total corruption are in the lack of a legal and institutional framework, so, where it lies, nothing matters to organize clear control over the vicariousness of the local law enforcement agency. It is our function and the highest order to perform any kind of duplication of strangers. Kozhen may no longer be called for the Vikonannya command, laid down by the new LAW. For those who cannot cope with such tension in their minds, there is only one way: to the exit. At the same time, at the entrance to the zone... The swelling of the staff of security forces is no longer acceptable to such an approach. In this way, it is possible to reduce to a minimum the number of those who, be it a righteous law, work against the unjust and recruit honest professionals, whose work will be fairly ordered only by the sovereign, and not by special interests. Otherwise, Ukraine will have to face the worst level of corruption in the world for a long time.
What is the responsibility of the SBU Directorate and the Prosecutor's Office of the Vinnytsia region - the law, statistics and "concepts"? Shanovni forum members! The article, which expresses your respect, was actually submitted by me in a short version, in accordance with Art. 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, a statement of information about the commission of atrocities by military officials of the Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region in the name of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine. Unfortunately, just like before, the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine “played the same game” and forwarded the application to one of those who blessed this crime - the prosecutor's office of the Vinnytsia region. As soon as the trace was cleared, the rest could not be more original than this banal version, signed by the head of the department G. Pidverbnaya, about those who are being examined by the prosecutor’s office Beastly... independent procedural person ...by filing an appeal. Any preemption was not allowed for him. No facts have been established of the infusion of third-party influences on the sovereign accuser, as well as any possible corrupt acts...” It is important to know about the results of verifying the findings in the STATEMENTS OF FACTS and accepted on their basis, transferred BY LAW, there is no implicit decision in this statement. In a word, the evidence is given in the style of understanding a deaf person with them. I will turn to you every step of the way, regardless of who and what position he takes, in the end I will become the authority of the state, to help those “lost in three pines” to observe the rule of law in the country, and to oust us. transfer of Article 98 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine and introduce a resolution on the violation of criminal law, or the dismissal of Article 99 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine and introduce a resolution about Vidmova in the violation of criminal law. The distribution of all your assets will gladly be received before the materials of the prosecutor’s decision are discredited before the court. With respect Yuriy Levchenko
Occupying permanent plantations, associated with the vikonanny of organizational and administrative oblasts, military service officials of the SBU Directorate in the Vinnytsia region: head of the department of counter-intelligence for the protection of the economy (KZE) Lieutenant Colonel Igor Sosnovsky, senior operational officer of his branch, Captain Yulian Migaenko, senior investigator of the surveillance branch, Major Ruslan Sich, and head of the surveillance branch, Colonel Serhiy Pugach, with beautiful motives and in the interests of a third person - the director of the private housing enterprises "San-Bud" and "Podillya-Bud" Oleksandr Samoilenko, who are not victorious for any reason from the state funds, an auxiliary apparatus, given to them in the service of corruption, transport and communications, the way of crushing evidence of the accused was sought to be destroyed by the intercessor of the prosecutor of the Vinnytsia region Volodymyr Sichuk in the leaf fall of 2005 the fate of the criminal case against the accused. among a number of evildoers, transmitted Part 4 Art. 190, part 2 of article 364 and part 2 of article 366 of the CC of Ukraine.
Their central superiors - Colonel Petro Korol, Colonel Mikola Malinovsky and Major General Ivan Kulak, in spite of their service teams, cleverly did not blame the evils that their subordinates committed. For their violation, criminally on the right, in violation of the law on surveillance, to conduct a pre-trial investigation, the prosecutor's office of the Vinnytsia region was directed directly to the investigative department of the Ukrainian State Security Service in Vinnytsia region. After the immediate extension of the term of pre-trial investigation, for the minds of the injured party and the guard of the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine, it is impossible for the justice to make a legal decision due to the assumptions at the pre-trial stage The investigation of the crime, under the pressure of the designated military service personnel, the SBU Directorate in the Vinnytsia region, was sent to court. Being under the influx of “crisis” Oleksandr Samoilenko law enforcement officers, the local court on November 20, 2006, vinis virok about the reduction of my will by a line of 6 rocks, which was subject to appeal by the court of appeal of Vinnytsia region 03/23/2007 rock. In the process of repeated examinations, the court of the first instance stated that in the process of pre-trial investigation, the evidence was not reached to the materials of the investigation of over 50 primary documents, which may lead to a lack of significance In order to establish the truth on the right, in some cases the norms of civil law, criminal procedure and criminal law are incorrectly established, and in other cases the norms of civil law are simply not established. The court of the first instance made a decision to send a certificate for additional investigation in accordance with the rules of traceability, however, due to the pressure of the initiators of the crime appeal to the court of appeal, the rest, the decisions of the courts of the first instance are invariably conceded and sent to the right for a new judicial review. The fourth review was carried out in the court of the first instance, once again ending with a decision to return the certificate to the prosecutor to confirm the violation of the criminal procedural code of Ukraine, which was committed at the time by the pre-trial investigation.
The next time, for the sake of “honor to the uniform”, the prosecutor’s office again sent the petition to the appellate authority with a view to appealing the decision to the court and forwarding it to the first court for a new (FYTH!!) review instances. Submitting materials for the violation of criminal records to the prosecutor's office of the Vinnytsia region about those who „ Levchenko Y.A., being a service person... on the basis of false documents, implementing VAT "Autoservice"... unfinished life, how to operate PPBC "Podillya-Bud" and in such a manner.... having established the VAT "Auto Service" mine...., which is a clever scam..., the exploitation of the service establishment... and the service subdivision.. " , designated military service personnel The Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region knew for certain that the private enterprise “Podillya-Bud” was not and could not be the ruler of unfinished everyday life, looking at the future. Unfinished business, about how we are going, was sent to the agreement on the construction of a 35-apartment building on the street. Engelsa 35 dated 09 April 1997, laid between the VAT “Vinnytsia Canning Plant” (abbreviated as VAT “VKZ”), as the Deputy and the private enterprise “San-Bud”, as the Vikonavets. Following this agreement, the Deputy Minister agreed to give the land plot, communications engineering, and transfer to the authorities the part of the apartments of the newly restored residential building, and Vikonavets, for the storage of their materials and work, until the end of 1998, the fate of the goiter was the whole of this living 35 apartment booth. dismantled and reinstalled unilaterally owned by the state a small town dwelling (with a surplus value of 45 thousand UAH), illegally depriving from the statutory fund of VAT "VKZ" a grocery store (with a surplus value of 68 thousand UAH) and a gas station, which were on the balance sheet of Zamovnik, By the end of 1997, fate had managed with its own efforts to eliminate the unfinished zero cycle of a 35-apartment building (incomplete building). Later, in 1997, the newspaper “Uriadoviy Kuryer” (No. 179-180) published a report about the beginning of the bankruptcy procedure of Zamovnik. work, with the specified price parameters, work and investments in the unfinished work of materials, without preparing any supporting documents to the Deputy after the destruction. arbitration court The Vinnytsia region issued a bankruptcy certificate to VAT “VKZ”, without submitting an application for inclusion in the warehouse of creditors of the debtor of Vikonavets, and the latter was not included in the list of creditors.
The Supreme Security Service of Ukraine knew that on the 9th of 1998 the Arbitration Court of the Vinnytsia region made a decision declaring VAT “VKZ” bankrupt, and on the 18th of 1998 it was declared bankrupt Commission for liquidation. Due to these circumstances, the entrepreneurial activity of VAT “VKZ” was imposed and, as a result, the bankruptcy of the private enterprise “San-Bud” was recognized as having passed. Thus, the right to return the deposits from the unfinished business of the Vikonavets spent. The work itself is unfinished, having been lost in the warehouse of the whole mine complex (abbreviated as CMK) VAT "VKZ" entered into the liquidation mass, the implementation of which was carried out by the liquidation bankrupt commission. Documents about the transfer of unfinished work in the warehouse of the Central Metallurgical Plant to the waste of third parties, including the San-Bud PP, were not processed by the liquidation commission of the VAT VKZ. Military officials of the USBU knew that on June 12, 1999, the head of the liquidation commission A.G. Dovgovetsky, despite the fact that there is no legal basis for the activities in the name of the director of VAT “VKZ”, the remaining administrative activities of VAT “VKZ” were suspended, and the workers were put on the stand Article 17 of the Law of Ukraine “On Bankruptcy”, having established the service division, having entered into agreement No. 42 with PP “San-Bud” for the construction of a 60-apartment residential building on the street. Engels, in which he became bankrupt, having become Zamovnik, and PP “San-Bud” by Vikonovets. Agreement No. 42 dated 10/12/1999 did not give the rock the necessary basis for gaining the right of authority over the unfinished work of the private enterprise “San-Bud”, not less from the point of view of the ineffectiveness of the signature of the head Liquidation Commission A.G. Dovgovetsky, as director of the VAT “VKZ”, and from the point of view of the relevant articles of the current Civil Code of the Ukrainian Socialist Republic (1963), the Law of Ukraine “On Power” and other normative acts. For the right to authority on unfinished work on the street. Engelsa 35, the private enterprise “San-Bud” would need to enter into an agreement with the liquidation committee for the purchase and sale of unfinished property, which was not completed. The very fact that agreement No. 42 was signed on 10/12/1999 indicates that until the moment of the residual sale of the bankrupt mine, the unfinished business was in the liquidation warehouse. On June 19, 2000, the entire mining complex, with all its assets and liabilities, was purchased by the company “Ukinvest Development Limited” at the closed auction. The new authority of the Central Committee, among other documents, has denied the right to the right of the private enterprise “San-Bud”, as Vikonavtsa is working on the dispute of the living quarters in front of the Deputy - VAT “VKZ”.
After the sale of the bankrupt mine, the legal entity VAT “Vinnytsia Cannery” did not lose its property. Transition to the purchase of the Central Metallurgical Plant of the right of authority to the unfinished building on the street. Engelsa 35 is confirmed by low documents and materials of the official listing between the buyer’s enterprise “Vinnytsia Cannery” and the private enterprise “San-Bud”. Confirmation of the validity of claims for unfinished construction at the private enterprise “San-Bud”, however, is due to the fact that it entered into agreement No. 7/1 dated January 29, 2001 for the construction of a 60-apartment Zhitlovogo budinka on the street. Engels in the city of Vinnytsia with the assistance of the “Vinnytsia Cannery”, as the Deputy and the lord of unfinished life. This agreement, in connection with the ongoing operational activities of the private enterprise “San-Bud”, will subsequently become known as having lost its decency. These very circumstances, which were well known to the military service personnel of the Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region, formed the basis for the design by me, on the basis of the various departments, in the name of the enterprise “Vinnytsia Cannery”, General Estate of VAT “Avtoservis” dated March 10, 2004 to the construction of a 60-apartment residential building, opened and attached by the private enterprise “San-Bud” in 1997 roci. Having dismantled the private enterprise “San-Bud”, the unfinished building, VAT “Autoservice”, over the course of 2004-2005, called to this place a rich apartment building, which in the future, After being taken into service by the State Commission, the settlements were mainly carried out by these families of military servicemen and officers of the Ministry of Taxes and Taxes of Ukraine. The Vinnytsia region also knew about those that the private enterprise „Podillya-Bud”, without issuing the necessary document confirming the right of ownership of the unfinished business, on April 2, 2004, doomed the general interest from VAT „Avtoservis” to transfer to the remaining “an unfinished zero cycle of a residential building in the metro station of Vinnytsia at 35 Engelsa St.,” for which the transfer of the cost of the assigned price of the unfinished building in the amount of 17,000 was under constant obligation hryvnia We knew the stink about those in the process The investigation of the bankruptcy of the private enterprise “San-Bud” was filed on 04/02/2004 by the State Court of the Vinnytsia region, and the court received applications from creditors with major benefits to the debtor in the amount of UAH 2,076,000.00 . In connection with the fact that the amount assigned to the private enterprise “San-Bud” was not repaid in part, on 02/11/2005 the Supreme Court of the Vinnytsia region adopted a resolution on the recognition of the private enterprise “San-Bud” is bankrupt, and the military prosecutor of the Vinnytsia garrison, having destroyed the criminal justice system, has spent a hundred hundred thousand dollars by the private enterprise “San-Bud” over 1,5 million budget funds, reinsuranced by his Head Commands Military-Politary Forces of Ukraine for reorganization lived for military servicemen.
Also protecting the private interests of O. Samoilenko, the military service members of the Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region, the way of destroying criminal law, organized on me, as one of the key figures in the renewal of the work on the dispute 60-apartment booth on the street. Engelsa 35, “on”, which was intended, on the one hand, to “rehabilitate” O. Samoilenko in the eyes of the pre-trial investigation, and on the other hand, to remove the necessary expenses. It is characteristic that until the collapse of the criminal law, the organizers and Vikonavians were trying to convince the “region” with evidence of what was called an unfinished business, which should have been a private enterprise "San-Bud". Later, having obviously realized the futility of stealing money from the private enterprise “San-Bud”, the criminal record falsifiers learned a more complete version of the accusation based on the assertion about those who the master of unfinished everyday life and another private enterprise - “Podillya-Bud”. Decree on the destruction of criminal records of the accused Yu.A. Levchenko dated 04.11.2005 and 14.11.2005, it’s hard to say that during this period the pre-trial investigation “was carried out” by private enterprise “Podillya-Bud” is the lord of unfinished life as the legal culprit of the private enterprise “San-Bud”. The resolution about the attraction of the accused on November 16, 2005 specified such a new investigation - the private enterprise "San - Bud" was first reorganized into a private enterprise „Podillya-Bud” 26 June 2000 rock, and that, having said, became the ruler of the unfinished everyday life in the street. Engelsa 35. Just a few hours after the collapse of the criminal law, the Viconavians settled on the remaining option of determining the ruler of the unfinished life. In my opinion, the private enterprise “Podillya-Bud” became the owner of the unfinished work on the basis of the purchase and sale agreement No. 2-B, which, after all, was settled between private enterprises “San-Bud” and “Podillya-Bud” dated 24 June 2001 and the act of capture and transfer dated 01/26/2001. Available materials confirm that until November 16, 2005, data about the availability of the purchase and sale agreement No. 2-B dated January 24, 2001 and executed on this basis in the act of capture and transfer of On January 26, 2001, the pre-trial investigation did not allow, and if it did, it did not risk “reporting” them in the materials, in view of the low facts and circumstances that were indicated by the investigation service these documents. First, about the implementation of agreement No. 2-B dated 01/24/2001 to the date of the act of capture - transfer dated 01/26/2001 to the date of 01/08/2005, the witness was informed by Viktoria Samoilenko - the squad O.M. Samoilenka and the leader of the private enterprise “Podillya-Bud”.
In the future, however, the evidence could not confirm these displays during the court hearing, explaining that all the government rights of the enterprise were dealt with, including the directors of the enterprise, and she doesn’t particularly remember anything. However, after I finish drinking Victoria Samoilenko, the pre-trial investigation “has arrived” about those that the private enterprise “Podillya-Bud” is the lord of the unfinished everyday life on the platform of the laid between them the purchase and sale agreement dated 01/24/2001 and the transfer act dated 01/26/2001, and not by way of infringement. We also know for sure about the service of the landowners of the private enterprises “San-Bud” and “Podillya-Bud”, the purchase and sale agreement No. 2-B and the act of acquisition and transfer dated January 26, 2001, the organizers And the victors of the criminal investigation, continuing their activities in the interests of O.M. Samoilenko, obviously went to falsify the so-called “Report on the assessment of the main - 60-apartment residential building (unfinished Budіvnitstvo), which (good on you!) is on the balance sheet of PPBK „Podillya-Bud”. With this in mind, investigator R.V.Sich, 09.11.2005, for the minds of the importance of dismantled unfinished everyday life and above all the benefits of official legislation, which conveys the conduct in such situations technical expertise, the decision was made about the recognition of commodity marking expertise, as a result of which the statement “It’s about the assessment...”, and not the title of an expert, was born. Having violated the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On the assessment of mines, mine rights and professional appraisal activities in Ukraine”, Article 11 states that: “Deputies for the assessment of mines can be individuals who are designated to be legally responsible bases and those who have mains on legal bases, as well as those who ask for an assessment of the main for authorized appointments of individuals. The assessment assistants are responsible for ensuring that the subject of the assessment activity has access to the site, which facilitates the assessment on legal grounds, preventing them from receiving the necessary and reliable information about the site being assigned to the site. “conducting this assessment,” the organizers and investigators of the criminal justice system, without any desire to respect the information about the type of individual who was legally responsible and without ensuring the access of the assessor to that lane (incomplete the day was no longer awake), we prepared the text of the contract for independent assessment No. 70-05-R with the private structure “Vinnytsia Design Institute”, in which the SBU of the Vinnytsia region entered into "Zamovnik".
On the basis of this agreement, the military service of the Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region received, before the examination, not a ship's expert, but an evaluator, who had not undergone training and certification as an expert. singing specialty” not literally. Preparations for the assessment “The report about the assessment of the mine...” formalized as a result of the failed criminal investigation. Apparently, without informing the assessment of the establishment of another organization about the need for dismantling, which was initiated by the private enterprise “San-Bud” in 1997 due to the unfinished work in We are fully aware of the fact that the dismantling of this unfinished building was carried out by the joint stock company “Avtoservis” in 2004, the officials of the USBU, thereby knowingly introducing the assessor into fraud. As a result of the Shakhrai actions of the military townsmen of the Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region, it is assessed, respectfully, that assesses the disputes in 1997, the object of unfinished activity, in fact having assessed the work and investments in the capital and materials of the joint stock company “Avtoservis” since 2005. As a result, the property of the unused object is equalized with the price fixed in the general agreement between „Podillya - Bud” and VAT „Autoservice” dated 04/02/2004, grew up 25 times and reached a mark of 429,641 UAH (with maximum allowance — 515,569 UAH) It is characteristic that the very results of this “Zvita...” were the director of the private enterprise “Podillya-Bud” O.M. Samoilenko, submitting an application for the name of the investigator R.V. Sich, with the intention of obtaining a copy of the “Podillya-Bud” application dated January 25, 2006 to the State Court in the criminal records. Vinnytsia region with the help of VAT „Autoservice” about the return to the object of unfinished work or the removal of material damage. (in size, which 25 times (!?) exceeded the price of unfinished work, assigned by him, in the constitution of the General Court in the name of the private enterprise “Podillya-Bud” from VAT „Autoservice” dated 04/02/2004 about the sale of the remaining illegal „Podillya-Bud” unfinished building on Engelsa st. 35).
It is characteristic that during my special collaboration with the director of the private enterprise “Podillya - Bud” O.M. Samoilenko, which took place in another decade in 2005 in the presence of another director enterprise, a great worker of the UVS of the Vinnytsia region M.I. Fertyuk in the premises of “Elite billiards” in the metro station of Vinnytsia on the street. There are 8 cosmonauts, the rest of them were told that on the right it would be possible to hand over 100 thousand US dollars to these individuals especially. At about the same hour, with the proposal “a rare breed of criminality on the brightest minds” reached my 88-year-old mother, one of the USBU spivs, who I dared to lose myself in the unknown. Much later, and in the brutal year of 2006, with the proposal to “settle the right for 25 thousand US dollars,” a lawyer of the private enterprise “Podillya-Bud” killed one of my clients. S.A. Khomenchuk (brother of the first intercessor of the prosecutor of the Vinnytsia region). Later, in the spring of 2006, this proposition was repeated by another person I knew, but all these propositions were thrown out by me. More than once, they persistently insisted for me at that hour to call “for help” before the kerivnitsa department of the Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region, trusting individuals from a close location of the kerivnitsa bureau itself.
It is important to note that I will issue a ruling regarding the violation of criminal justice law in the Leninsky District Court of Vinnytsia. The head of this court, a senior clerk of the prosecutor’s office of the Vinnytsia region, I.Yu. Vishar, (a friend of the intercessor of the regional prosecutor V.V. Sichuk, who passed the resolution on the destruction of the criminal record in my opinion) took a special look at my scarga accused). As it was followed, on December 28, 2005, the fate of I.Yu. Vishar blamed the decision, which in the satisfied misery was confirmed. The Court of Appeal of the Vinnytsia region, in its praise of 03/02/2006, expressed its praise for the decision of I.Yu. Vishar, calling on this same court, or in another warehouse, to look at the money again. This procedure was completed by the same senior prosecutor of the prosecutor's office of the Vinnytsia region - Judge A.V. Mikhailenko. The rest, motivating their actions by the fact that the “pre-trial investigation body for criminal proceedings against the accused Yu.A. Levchenko issued a conscription under Article 218 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine”, having adopted on March 22, 2006 The decision about Vidmova is “satisfied with the greed for the decision on the violation of criminal law.” Repeated applications to the central structures of state control bodies in the city of Kiev, as a rule, turned to the prosecutor's office of the Vinnytsia region, which, without going into verification, submitted formal signatures (prepared) to the central apparatus Vikonavians of criminal law) about the legality of the violation of criminal law and carried out within the framework of the pre-trial investigation.
More than once, the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine, having thoroughly familiarized itself with the materials of the criminal investigation, has drawn up a report about those that, during the investigation of the criminal investigation, there were violations of a criminal and procedural nature, such as It is impossible to accept the remaining legal decision” and asked the prosecutor’s office of the Vinnytsia region to remove them (GPU sheet No. 04/4/1-3503-06 dated 04/05/2006). This statement of the General Prosecutor's Office was ignored by the law enforcement authorities of the region, and accumulated over the course of a 6-month pre-trial investigation, the number of violations of the Law, in spite of the fact that the justice suffered and the facts were brought to light on the side of the accused, did not begin to investigate before the court with an absurd charge about those that “Levchenko Yu.A., being a special official... selling VAT “Autoservice” someone else’s work site and other people’s work materials, as in effectiveness belong to PPBK “Podillya-Bud”, and have hijacked the VAT “Avtoservis” mine, cleverly deceiving the swindler, so that they have hijacked someone else’s lane of deception, perpetrated on a particularly large scale, deceiving the service establishment and the service details” A direct influx into the consideration of criminal justice in court in order to achieve a favorable result for the organizers and the Vikonaviks, along with contacts with the official courts, the intercessor of the head of the SBU Vinnytsia region Colonel M.A. Malinovsky and chief The next one was Colonel S.V. Pugach. Obviously, the plan for operational and sound investigations on the legal support of criminal justice (SSCC) was transferred to such a form of operation of the operational support as the immediate presence at all meetings without guilt to the court of the first instance of one of the “Rozrobniki” - the operationally important branch of the KZE, Captain Yu.V. Migaenko.
The rest, not without depriving them of their physical presence, but also by making an unspoken audio recording of the trial, briefing witnesses before their appearance in court, maintaining a stable “Business” contact with the sovereign accuses and judges. During the trial, obviously also within the framework of the CCCS, there was a continuous wiretapping of the defendant’s home and mobile phones, “by activating the interception facility,” telephone calls were made to family members with insinuations of a provocative nature, too. Through a large colleague in the service, the operational relations of Yu. Migaenko, I was persuaded to wait for the court to impose a mental term of punishment in exchange for the release of “Service to the press.” Having been removed from office, the military service officials of the Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region deposed the Staromisky district court of Vinnytsia, in the special court of L.F. Nechiporuk, until the death of the 20.11.2006 viroku about the reduction of will by the term for 6 days. For obvious information, the text is in electronic form from the preparations of the investigator R.V. Sich and the head of the investigation department, Colonel S.V. Pugach, at the headquarters of the Ukrainian State Security Service in the Vinnytsia region. Regardless of the continued pressure, the Court of Appeal of the Vinnytsia region ruled against L.F. Nechiporuk. As a result of the re-examination of the document, the Staromisky District Court of the city of Vinnytsia issued a ruling about those that the pre-trial investigation allowed for incorrectness and inconsistency of the investigation, which cannot be included in the court hearing, and should be sent to that right regional prosecutor's office to organize additional investigation.
However, the sovereign prosecutor, deputy prosecutor of the Staromisky district of Vinnytsia S.M. Pivnyuk, finally rejected the procedure of registration, filing an appeal about the disadvantages of such decisions to the court of the first instance, and the appeal court of the Vinnytsia region, under the pressure of the organizers Wikonavians of criminal justice, praised the direction of the application for a new review to the court of the first instance. Having looked at the criminal law, the Staromisky District Court of Vinnytsia, has made a decision about those that the investigator in some cases incorrectly established, and in other cases, without correcting the norms of civil law, criminal procedural and criminal law, and that on the right is directed to the regional prosecutor's office to organize additional investigation in the area according to the rules of investigation. This additional investigation is carried out not by a special authority, but by internal law enforcement agencies, as required by the law. However, again and again, the sovereign accused S. Pivnyuk, who supported the accusation of three fatalities at all (more than 50) court sessions, regardless of those who, as a result of the third review criminal proceedings in the court of the first instance, the court did not establish the fact of the ownership of the unfinished business of the private enterprise “Podillya-Bud”, and, incidentally, withdrew new data about the lack of evidence of such visnovku, zmusheniya withdraw these statements, again filing an appeal to the appellate court of the Vinnytsia region with a strong claim to challenge the decision of the local court and send a right to a new judicial review at the same court.
In this case, trying to prove the right of the authorities to the unfinished work of the private enterprise “Podillya-Bud”, the state accuser himself went to the extent of falsifying documents that were of an evidentiary nature. The pressure of the organizers and Vikonavians of the criminal case, immediately on the appeal court of the Vinnytsia region, calling before the appeal court of the Vinnytsia region, Having heard neither the representative of the regional prosecutor's office, neither the judge nor anyone knew about the date of review of the document in the court hearing, (the summons and notification about the date of the meeting were served on the day after the review of the document in the appeal judges), having found out that it was necessary satisfy the appeal of the sovereign accuser and send the right for a new (FOURTH) review to the court of the first instance. Having examined the materials and assessed the indictment, the Vinnytsia District Court in the special court of O.I. Bondarenko issued a resolution that recorded the essential violations of the pre-trial investigation of the criminal procedural law (the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine itself immediately spoke about them) and turned the right to the prosecutor to correct the shortcomings. However, once again, due to the situation of excessive force, they forced the sovereign prosecutor to send the petition to the appellate authority regarding the decision of the Vinnytsia District Court and to send the right to a new (FAST!) review in the court of the first instance.
According to the prosecutor, at the fourth review, the court showed preemption. In this case, observing the development of the laws, it is not at all believable that the court is in a state of urgency, and the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine has been ordered to carry out any kind of order. continues to be ignored by the prosecutor's office of the Vinnytsia region. Based on the fact that the shortcomings not addressed by the prosecutor led to the denial of the right of the accused, guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine, to defend himself against the charge brought (the pre-trial investigation brought an unspecific charge), and perhaps A somewhat different view of justice in court calls for further violation of people’s rights - the right to a fair trial in terms of the reasonableness of the lines of review of justice in court, and according to this parameter, violation of the law may not be less of a basis for execution before the European Court for the rights of people, and before packing the books Guinness records, not to be outdone, but, obviously, inadvertently encourages the observation of legality before committing other offenses, prohibitions, Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, such as Part 2 of Article 58 The Constitution of Ukraine and Part 3.Article 3 of the Constitutional Code of Ukraine state the fundamental criminal legal principle of “no punishment without the law.” Of course, one could assume that the actions of the prosecutor are dictated by the so-called vested interests of the prosecutor’s office, such as in the media of mass information, articles on the textbook “Advancement of Law Enforcement Traditions”, “Prosecutor's bread.. and prosecutor's cake”, “Smart, beautiful and beautiful” and the like, I don’t hesitate to describe myself as an unreconciled fighter against violations of the law. It could be that the same types of mass information were not wasted and other statistics, instead of which it is important to look at the methods of work “smart and simple” more respectfully. I would like to take an interview with the first intercessor of the regional prosecutor Oleg Khomenchuk, published in the Vinnytsia newspaper “Channel 33” on December 27, 2006 under the title “Kerivnik will immediately find money for payment” wages, as against everyone else, are being destroyed by the criminal right.”
The very title of the article is meant to indicate that the destruction of criminal justice by the Vienna Prosecutor’s Office is seen as one of the main tools for solving conflict situations, as they arise in the sphere of civil and legal issues. People have been talking about the text for years. Isn’t there an explanation here for the actions of another lawyer from the Khomenchuks’ ancestral homeland, Sergius, who is at the forefront of the interests of Oleksandr Samoilenko? Who is the prosecutor’s office protecting? The final “concepts” and how many decisions need to be submitted to the courts of the first instance, so that the prosecutor’s office of the region does not honor the uniform of those who fabricated the right and wrongdoing criminally - procedural law by sending them to court, and in view of the benefits of the Constitution of Ukraine itself became a guarantor of possible pardons and crimes? In the end, it is necessary for this country to give a proper legal assessment to counterfeiters of legal documents, which cause great moral and material harm to both the powers and the citizens of Ukraine, What did the local “princesses” mean to tell the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine? Yuriy LEVCHENKO is a citizen of Ukraine, a citizen of Vinnytsia, a lieutenant colonel of the SBU at the branch of the PS. The organizers of the event, General Ivan Kulak, and his protector Mykola Malinovsky, retired. The first one is now busy with the cultivation of decorative bushes on a permanent basis, and is also actively working on the promotion of the regional center of the huge union “Strength and Honor” (!!??), the other one is concerned with the creation of “backbreaking labor” business. Promotions in the occupation of the positions of the Vikonavians - Igor Sosnovsky became a lieutenant colonel and the head of the department, Yulian Migaenko - a captain. The head of the next department, Sergiy Pugach, not only became a colonel, but, as knowledgeable people think, he still decided to “stifle” VAT “Autoservice” and “vibulate” especially himself, for certain reasons shareholders, 3-room apartment. The comments seem to be welcome.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, Facebook , Twitter , VK - Only new faces from the SKLEP section!