Apparently, our new government won't be entirely new. In the sense that, in addition to Poroshenko's stooge as Prime Minister Groysman, we'll also be seeing a slew of old thieves. For example, Oleh Lyashko will be given the Ministry of Ecology as a sop for the coalition. A damned position. It's as if the very position itself encourages large-scale theft. But Oleh Lyashko is proposing a candidate for this post who isn't afraid of the position, because this candidate has been engaged in fraud his entire life. So, meet, or at least remember—Andriy Artemenko, reports "THEME".
Until recently, he claimed to be the financial coordinator of the Right Sector, but the Right Sector quickly saw the light and fired the fraudster. Then he joined the omnivorous Lyashko. So, let's recap. Here's what the website "Tema" wrote about this fraudster:
"
About the life and adventures of the financial coordinator of the Right Sector, Andrei Artemenko, a well-known political defector and defendant in four criminal cases, who spent two years under arrest for embezzling millions of dollars from the Ministry of Defense, “fell terminally ill,” and was released by Renat Kuzmin (Read more about it in the article Renat Kuzmin: The Family Business of Outlaw Prosecutors) on a subscription under the guarantee of deputies Michal Dobkin and his comrades.
No, we don't participate in oligarchic squabbles over who pays the Right Sector. As long as the money goes toward countering separatists and restoring peace in the east of the country, we're not involved. But, noticing the organization's financial coordinator, responsible for—we dare say—a substantial budget, to the right of Right Sector leader Dmytro Yarosh, we became seriously concerned about the intended use of the organization's funds.
So, meet Andriy Artemenko (second from the right in the photo). It's easy to see that he's in excellent physical shape. Just a few years ago, after serving two and a half years in prison, he was released on bail from members of parliament due to his incurable cancer. We take this opportunity to congratulate Mr. Artemenko on his victory over his illness!
He is currently Dmytro Yarosh's chief financial manager. Previously, he was the president of the CSKA Kyiv football club, an advisor to Kyiv Mayor Omelchenko, and the head of the BYuT faction in the Kyiv City Council, from where he defected to Chernovetskyi's majority three months after being elected. He was close to Kuchma's notorious quartermaster Ihor Bakai, the Party of Regions member Vasyl Horbal, and other prominent public and political figures from the Kuchma-Yushchenko-Yanukovych era.
Regarding our hero's achievements in the financial field, it is impossible not to recall his arrest in 2002 by the Kyiv City Prosecutor's Office, who charged him under five articles of the Criminal Code. This led to the initiation of four criminal cases, including one on suspicion of large-scale embezzlement.
The case's background is as follows. Back in 2001, the prosecutor's office opened a case of financial fraud at Naftogaz Ukrainy. During the investigation, investigators uncovered another crime involving the embezzlement of funds from the Defense Ministry's football club, CSKA Kyiv. Thus, in 2002, Artemenko became a defendant in the case of the embezzlement of millions of rubles from the Defense Ministry.
This is how it sounds in the rough language of the investigative report: “…it was established that on December 17, 1997, Artemenko intentionally and illegally, that is, in violation of the procedure established by paragraph 4 “d” of Art. 5 of the Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated 19.02.1993 No. 15-93 "On the system of currency regulation and currency control", the Regulation on the procedure for granting individual licenses for opening accounts in foreign banks by residents, approved by the Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine No. 328 dated 29.12.1995, without obtaining an individual license from the National Bank of Ukraine for the right to open and use accounts in foreign banks outside of Ukraine, using the documents of the company "Denvell Trading LLC" (USA) in his name, opened an exclusive account No. 14554, named Denvell, in the bank "VEFbank" in Riga, Latvia (197 Brivibas Street, Riga, LV - 1039? Latvia). After opening this account, Artemenko A.V. "in the period from 17.12.1997 to 30.06.2000, he carried out law enforcement actions in relation to the funds that were received into the specified account." "...In addition, Artemenko A.V., occupying, in accordance with the order of the Minister of Defense of Ukraine No. 291 of 22.09.1999, the position of the head of the state enterprise of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine "Football Club CSKA-Kyiv" ... in the period from 15.03.2000 to 29.06.2000, committed theft by appropriation, embezzlement and abuse of his official position of property (money) entrusted to him in the amount of 3,954,459 US dollars."
The deal involved transferring football players, the proceeds from whose sales were deposited not into the football club's account, but into Artemenko's private bank account abroad. To achieve this, our hero forced the CSKA players to sign contracts with his personal offshore company.
Artemenko spent two and a half years in captivity after his arrest in April 2002. Seeking some relief from his incarceration, he suddenly fell terminally ill, being transferred from his pretrial detention cell to a hospital ward. He finally succeeded in getting a court order to remand his case for further investigation. Although the prosecution had requested a ten-year sentence, Artemenko managed to reach an agreement with Deputy Prosecutor General Kudryavtsev. After this, Kyiv Prosecutor Renat Kuzmin was able to change Artemenko's pretrial detention. Renat Kuzmin did just that, placing the defendant in the custody of a cohort of Party of Regions MPs—Dobkin, Lelyuk, and Chelombitko—as well as foreign party members Verevskyi and Rudenko.
Incidentally, let us note that before Artemenko, the president of FC CSKA-Kyiv was Victor Topolov – a banker and later the Minister of the Coal Industry. However, the investigation never got to him... The secret is simple: Topolov stole more professionally. The account of his offshore company was registered at a fictitious bank that didn't even have an address—just a post office box in Austria, making it elusive to investigators. Artemenko replaced Topolov at the club under the protection of Igor Bakai, who hoped that FC CSKA Kyiv would become a convenient money laundering shell. It's enough to recall that from the very first day, representatives of Igor Bakai's team exerted intense pressure on the investigation into the embezzlement at CSKA Kyiv.
In fact, Artemenko's business ventures began under the tutelage of Igor Bakai, under whom he served and who placed him in the transfer scheme for the football club. Later, when massive shortfalls were discovered at the club, Artemenko was appointed as an advisor to Mayor Omelchenko. From the very beginning of the criminal prosecution, he claimed that it was political repression.
After his release, the "terminally ill" Artemenko returned to life. In March 2006, he became the head of the BYuT faction in the Kyiv City Council. Three months later, he betrayed his fellow party members, defecting to Chernovetskyi's majority.
To completely clear his name, in 2007, he had the Holosiivskyi District Court in Moscow close the case. The case was heard by a new judge, Oleksandr Boyko, who had arrived from the outskirts. He dismissed all the cases. The reasoning behind his decision is staggering: Boyko was simply calling black white. Oh well! He soon acquired capital real estate, clearly with the assistance of Holosiivskyi District Court Chairwoman Pervushina, who, back in 202, had refused to authorize Artemenko's arrest, replacing it with bail of several thousand hryvnias (given the embezzlement amounted to $4 million!).
In addition to his aforementioned political activities close to the powerful (for example, in the Kyiv City Council, he was responsible for waste disposal issues, among other things), Artemenko was active in a charitable foundation, which, as you might have guessed, had contacts with foreign entities. The foundation allegedly supplied computers for schoolchildren from abroad. The competent authorities never investigated the foundation's activities. And judging by Mr. Artemenko's current position, it's unlikely anyone will risk investigating him anymore.
But if such an idea were to arise, the documents below provide all the grounds for reviving the case of the million-dollar embezzlement at the army football club.
PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF UKRAINE
PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF KIEV CITY
03150, metro Kiev, vul. Predslavinska, 45/9, tel. 524-82-55
E-mail: office@rgokiror.kiev.ua; http: www.ргокiроr.kiev.ua
To the Court of Appeal of the city of Kiev
Appellant: The person who destroyed the criminal records
she took part in the ship's investigation -
senior prosecutor-criminalist
prosecutor's office of the city of Kiev
Donskiy Oleksiy Illich
03150, metro Kiev, vul. ……….
to the decision of the Golosiivsky District Court of the city of Kiev Boyka O.V. dated 21.11.07
at reference No. 4-1753/07, for the skargs on the resolution about the violation of criminal records, it is clear that Artemenka A.V.
APPEAL
(in accordance with Art. 236-8, 347 CCP of Ukraine)
The decision of the judge of the Golosiivsky District Court of the city of Kiev on November 21, 2007 was satisfied with Andriy Viktorovich Artemenko’s scum on the decision about the violation of the good criminal records: issued on April 4, 2002 for signs of violation Zlochinіv, peredbachenikh Part 3 Art. 15, part 5 art. 191, part 1 art. 208 CC of Ukraine, issued 04/06/02 for signs of committing a crime, transferred to Part 2 of Art. 366 CC of Ukraine, dated 04/11/02 for signs of committing a crime, transferred to Part 5 of Art. 191 CC of Ukraine, dated July 22, 2002 for signs of committing a crime, transferred to Part 2 of Art. 364 CC of Ukraine; The relevant decisions are related, and in the broken criminal records it is clear that Artemenka A.V. per hour 3 tbsp. 15, part 5 art. 191, part 1 art. 208, part 2 art. 366, part 5 art. 191, part 2 art. 364 CC of Ukraine confirmed.
It turns out that when this decision was made by the court, there was a fundamental violation of the criminal procedural law, the criminal law was incorrectly set up, in addition, the orders to the court, as stated in the decision, do not correspond to the actual circumstances of the case. For such circumstances, the court ruling is declared illegal and extends the penalty beyond the present.
Thus, in the context of the decision, the court states that it cannot be ruled out that “...the criminal right of Artemenka A.V. was destroyed by means of reversal within the criminal justice system, the fragments at the time of the infliction of the insults The decisions had already been completed by a pre-trial investigation at the criminal justice department, which gave the investigator all the rights provided by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine to verify their arguments and confirm their actions Artemenko A.V. zlochinіv…”.
This position is not based on the law, but remains consistent with Art. 94, 98 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, criminal investigations are violated for the evidence for their drives and frames, and not for paying attention to the principle. The same criminal law on the right cannot be destroyed beyond the scope of verification within the boundaries of each individual, and at the same time does not lie in the fact that it is possible to verify the affairs of such individuals within the framework of pre-trial proceedings. The investigations are in the hands of other authorities, which may not be possible. On the other hand, the court’s analysis of the so-called other procedural possibilities for revising the actions of Artemenka A.V. є gross damage caused by Art. 236-8 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, obviously, any court, considering the decision on the violation of criminal law, is obliged to verify the availability of the reasons and the basis for the issuance of the assigned decision and the legality of the decision is taken away data, which became a basis for the adoption of a resolution about the destruction of justice. Investigating the possibilities of pre-trial investigation in the aspect of the crime related to the subject to go beyond the boundaries of the court.
Therefore, the argument to the court about those that Artemenka A.V. violations “...by means of verification within the criminal justice system”, with which the court “cannot accommodate” assumptions that are not based on factual circumstances.
Does not demonstrate effectiveness and is not supported by evidence examined in the court hearing and sent to the court for those that “... presented before the court materials on the basis of which a disgraceful ruling on the violation was made criminal records of Artemenka A.V., do not contain sufficient information about the evidence in the actions of Artemenko A.V., a sign of crimes, referred to in Part 3 of Article 15, Part 5 of Article 191, Part 1 of Art. Part 5 Art. 191, Part 2 Art. 364 Criminal Code of Ukraine”.
Zokrem, the court completely ignored the motivation given for this drive, both in the documents of the prosecutor's office against the scum, and also in the court hearing.
In every case, a detailed argument was made to establish the signs of warehouses of evildoings, in connection with the crimes of Artemenko A.V. which evidently violated criminal records. In this case, the documentary data that they were replaced by the materials of the criminal report No. 50-2750 at the time of the destruction obviously Artemenka A.V. criminal records completely correspond with the dispositions of the articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, for which such records were violated. Evidence that confirms the sufficiency of data about the evidence in the actions of Artmenka A.V., a sign of evil, for which the correct analysis of them is destroyed, is brought to the accused (Vol. 12, а.с.а.с. 8-186); It is important that most of them were obtained within the framework of the criminal investigation No. 50-2750, until the moment of destruction of the criminal records, it is clear that Artemenka A.V.
It means that we have a connection with the consideration of the disgraced Artemenko A.V. decisions, all submitted materials were submitted before the trial.
It is not based on the law and sent to the court for those that “...please, the illegality of which is indicated in the disgraced decisions of the investigator, according to the order established by law, were not recognized as invalid, the other persons were not presented to them and were not considered competent by the courts...” So, the court deprived of respect for the situation that the given benefits, which became the basis for the individual legal security of the people by Artemenko A.V. evildoers, that is, in this way, an invisible warehouse mechanism for committing evildoings, in order to realize their objective side. However, the possibility of a court finding of these illegal activities lies in the sphere of the criminal process itself, since the establishment of this fact is strictly based on evidence obtained in the process of criminal investigation.
Such evidence, which could have really been brought to the forefront of the court, but was not taken by it to the fullest extent, will remain hidden in:
testimonies of football players of the DP MO of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev”, which signed string employment contracts with the company “Denvell Trading LLC”. It was stated that individuals who signed contracts or signed labor obligations for the company “Denvell Trading LLC” did not know this company or its personalities (representatives, leaders, principals); did not demand any charges from her either before or after the establishment of the corresponding contracts and subjectively accepted such contracts as those established with another legal entity (and itself, the DP of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine “CSKA-Kiev”). Zhoden of the football players could not explain the terms of the contracts with the company “Denvell Trading LLC”, linking their signing with the exclusive position of the services of the DP MO of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev” and the obvious labor benefits associated with this enterprise. Also, the actions of the football players when they signed contracts with “Denvell Trading LLC” did not show their will to create the legalities involved in such contracts, and their subjective acceptance of these contracts was then characterized by a pardon relationships to subjects and the nature of transactions, transferring contracts (Vol. 6, a.s. 7-164);
testimony of the service personnel of the DP of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev” Tkachenka P.O., Goncharuk L.M. and other agreements between the drive and the company “Denvell Trading LLC” and the conditions of signing of certain agreements (Vol. 7 А.с. а.с. 53-68, 48-52);
FIFA regulations “Statuses and transfers of ranks”, approved on October 1, 1997. FIFA Vikoncom; Regulations of FIFA Gravity Agents, approved on 12/11/1995. FIFA Vikoncom; Knight of the Regulations of All-Ukrainian Football Regulations for Non-Amateur Teams born in 1998/1999; Addendum No. 4 “Status and transfer of football players” to the Regulations of all-Ukrainian football regulations among non-amateur teams, born in 1999/2000. (Vol. 5 A.S. 199-226). Based on these documents, since the company “Denvell Trading LLC” is not a football club, it could not have the rights to football players, so it would not be important to acquire such rights and transfer (including sell) them to football clubs, and also, for all intents and purposes, I could not completely or frequently withdraw compensation for the transfer transfers of the Gravians. So, okay Art. 18, paragraph 5 of the Regulations of FIFA Gravity Agents, and Article 28 Addendum No. 4 “Status and transfer of football players” to the Regulations of all-Ukrainian football regulations among non-amateur teams in 1999/2000. I am pleased to inform the football clubs of the PFL of Ukraine during this period, when a football player transfers from a club to a club (team) after the transfer contract (club-club) has been established, signed by the presidents and certified with the seals of football clubs; a club that pays compensation for the transfer of a graver may make a payment directly to the beneficiary club.
Also, similar to Art. 32 chapter 9, art. 14, 15 chapter 5 FIFA Regulations “Statuses and transfers of ranks”, approved on October 1, 1997. the FIFA Vikonkom, only the club has the right to wrest compensation from the result of its contract with the new club; This right may be transferred to another club, but not in any way to other parties - under no circumstances; The amount of compensation is agreed between clubs.
In total, it sufficiently confirms the number of contractual contracts between the company “Denvell Trading LLC” and the players of “FC CSKA-Kiev”, which means that the company has any transfer rights to footballers of the DP MO of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev”, as well as the lack of supply of transfer contracts concluded between the company “Denvell Trading LLC” and the DP MO of Ukraine „FC CSKA-Kiev” from the transfer drive meaning of rights, so that the fictitious nature of the deposits, agreements on contracts.
Thus, these transfer contracts transferred the transfer of the sovereign's pennies to the capital of Artemenko A.V. „Denvell Trading LLC” is honored for services that, in principle, remaining true to its nature could not have given.
In this case, all the evidence was obtained even before the destruction of the first criminal case, as is evident from Artemenka A.V., but the court did not take the stench.
In the aspect of the deposit, unfounded and not based on the evidence available to the justice, the motivation of the court is also added to the need to investigate the violation of criminal records, evidently Artemenka A.V., Gospodarskih vidnosin between “…DP of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev” and the companies “Larkford Services Limited”, “Redpoint Management LTD”, “Denvell Trading LLC” for the transfer of football players, the availability of backup agencies for changing the owner of transfer rights...” So, companies Larkford Services Limited, Redpoint Management LTD”, as well as “Denvell Trading LLC” also formed fictitious contracts from the DP of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev”, which were victorious as a means of stealing the sovereign’s penny money. The company, by its nature, could not hold transfer rights to football players, and therefore organize sales of such rights to the DP of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev” or any other entities. In this connection, on July 15, 2002, for the stated fact, the criminal law for the signs of warehouses of evil goods, transferring Part 3 of Art. 27, part 5 art. 191 CC of Ukraine; part 3 art. 27, part 3, article 15, part 5, art. 191 CC of Ukraine (Vol. 1 A.s. a.s. 26-28). This criminal case on the right was seen in the vicinity of the crime and is being investigated by the local prosecutor's office, the investigation is currently urgent.
Thus, the mutual relationship of the DP of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev” with the companies “Larkford Services Limited”, “Redpoint Management LTD” is the subject of investigation of other criminal proceedings and the possible court about the need for them verification to the destruction of criminal records clearly Artemenka A.V. It is baseless and not based on the law.
Requesting the court the need to carry out a designated check from these bases, which is particularly important for the DP of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev” V.S. Topolova. that of Grigorovich S.M. A decision was made about Vidmova in a broken criminal case and is illogical.
According to the first, the decision about Vidmova in the broken criminal case is clear to Topolova V.S. there was no wine in the evening.
According to a friend, exactly Grigorovich S.M. was convicted of broken criminal records for crimes incriminated against Artemenko A.V. through those who during the investigation did not produce any evidence that would have confirmed that Grigorovich, those involved in the actions that were later victorious against Artemenko A.V. for the number of such evil acts, we can now recognize the malicious intent revealed in Artemenka A.V. shodo vikradennya sovereign lane; the significance and role of their actions for the implementation of the stated intention, as well as through the availability of data about the intelligence of S.M. Grigorovich. malicious acts Artemenka A.V.
The decision about Vidmova in the broken criminal record is evidently a huge amount of security of the DP of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine “FC CSKA-Kiev”, which signed related documents with the companies “Larkford Services Limited” and “Redpoint Management LTD” has never been at fault. Prote, sufficient evidence to charge them with criminal liability has not yet been collected. It should be noted that during the administration of Artemenka A.V., these individuals did not allocate funds to their names, which were used to transfer the stolen pennies; did not transfer stolen pennies from the indicated accounts to your credit cards and credit cards of members of your homeland; did not lobby the FFU and PFL of Ukraine for registration of a complex of fictitious contracts (including with the companies “UNIWORLD TRADING INC” (USA), “Redpoint Management Limited” (England), “Larkford Services Limited” (England)), which subsequently served as a basis for the theft of the sovereign's pennies on particularly large scales.
Thus, an equal evidence base should be given to Artemenka A.V. and too many ceremonies of the DP of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine of FC "CSKA-Kiev" Topolov and Grigorovich, as if they would provide similar bases for the destruction of criminal law, obviously the rest, as a result, it will not be possible.
It does not correspond to the factual circumstances and evidence available to the court and the motivation of the court so that “... sending the investigator to the due diligence file No. 14554 in VEFbank... Artemenko A.V. as a physical person is not grounded on collected by investigation until the moment of destruction of the criminal record of the data, and the signing by an individual, as a representative of a legal entity, in the interests of the remaining interests of the current situation in the banking system cannot be identified with the right of power such physical person on the bank account...”
Thus, among the documents seized by the investigative body from the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Latvia for the ongoing fuss about providing legal assistance, it was clearly destroyed by Artemenka A.V. first from criminal records, bulls, zocrema:
a copy of the agreement dated 12/17/1997 about the supervision of Artemenko A.V. servicing box No. 14554 “Denvell” at the bank “VEFbank”. Here is the data that was included in the first Arkusha agreement, Artemenko A.V., as a client of the bank, openly called “DENVELL”;
copies of payment orders for the disposal of penny money according to the specified order, signed and signed by Artemenko A.V.;
a copy of the power of attorney issued by Denvell Trading LLC on the name of Andriy Artemenko, who, of course, still has the right to manage all areas of activity that may be related to politics companies; carry out all relevant activities to achieve such goals; open and exploit one or more banking accounts in the name of the company; write and sign checks and payment orders, as well as other documents that serve the purposes of the company or may be necessary for an individual to carry out his business activities of the company (T. 8 A.S. A.S. 1-46, 62-228; T. 1 A.S. 213-219, 238-266)
It is ordered to confirm the key changes of Artemenka A.V. How to dispose of this rahunkom and about the factual ownership of the rest.
In this case, the court did not obtain sufficient evidence from the materials about the victorious Artemenko A.V. statutory documents of the company “Denvell Trading LLC” and current power activities under the guise and name of “Denvell Trading LLC”, which confirms the general practice of the so-called “additional offshore companies.”
At the same time, the court deprived the position of respect and the furnishings of the warehouse of evil, transferred to Part 1 of Art. 208 of the CC of Ukraine, they carry out actions not only from the illegal derivation or exploitation by the citizens of Ukraine outside the borders of Ukraine of the currency levels of physical persons, but also of the areas of legal persons, which must be carried out (to carry out government activity) on the territory of Ukraine.
Sent to the court for those actions incriminated against A.V. Artemenko, which began during the period of the Criminal Code of Ukraine of 1960, except without establishing legal grounds for qualification in the criminal decisions for According to the Criminal Code of 2001, it does not demonstrate effectiveness.
Thus, the skin from the disgraced rulings of the motivational part was not directly sent to the stand for qualification of Artemenka A.V. for the Criminal Code of Ukraine 2001, formulated by the upcoming order “Doctors will direct...those who are ordered to do something before the entry into force of the official criminal law - the CC of Ukraine 2001, and the CC of Ukraine 2001 will be replaced criminal liability for them..., in accordance with Article 5 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine...”
When the decision was made, the court, contrary to the law, deprived the position of respect of the setting that the skarga Artemenka A.V. did not continue to satisfy anyone with formal motives. Thus, by the decision of the Solomyansky District Court of Kiev Khimich V.M. I give the criminal law, on the basis of Art. 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, was assigned to the ship's examination. Oh, okay, part 1, tbsp. 246 of the CPC of Ukraine, in cases where violations of the right were allowed, such violations were allowed by the CPC of Ukraine, without the exception of which on the right they cannot be assigned to the ship's examination, judging by the first review of the right, it is sent on the supplementary investigation. The number of bases before the collapse of criminal law, by virtue of Art. Art. 94, 98, 113 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine is an insane perversion for recognition before the court examination.
Also, the decision of the Solomyansky District Court of Kiev was confirmed, as it is formal and therefore has a prejudicial, criminally obligatory nature for all legal entities, confirming the existence of grounds for destruction In case of certain criminal cases, this method increased the possibility of another court of the first instance to review the decision data of the pre-trial investigation body.
Crimea, 11.11.07 Artemenkom A.V. an addition was made so called to the document filed on November 4, 2007 by the representative. This additional statement broadened the subject of the insult: since the original scum was the resolution on the destruction of criminal records on 04.04.02 and on 06.04.02, then “addition to the scum” - also the resolution on the violation of criminal records 04/11/02 and 07/22/02. In this manner, document submitted by Artemenko A.V. 11.11.07, for his subject and with the help of a new scarga. Unregardless of the matter, the court, above all Art. 236-8 of the CCP of Ukraine, a resolution about the protection of the remaining goods without guilt.
Respectfully, the resolution of the Golosiivsky District Court of the Kiev metro station dated November 21, 2007 regarding the violation of the resolution of Artemenka A.V. criminal certificates dated 04.04.02 for part 3 of article 15, part 5 of article 191, part 1 of article 208 of the CC of Ukraine; dated 04/06/02 for Part 2 of Article 366 of the Code of Ukraine; dated 04/11/02 for Part 5 of Article 191 of the Code of Ukraine; dated July 22, 2002 under Article 364 Part 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is illegal.
Z urahuvannyam vikladennogo, taking care of Art. 236-8, 347-350, 367, 369-371, 382 CPC of Ukraine, -
I BEG:
Decide your praise, with the decision of the Golosiivsky District Court of Kiev on November 21, 2007, with which the skarga Artemenka A.V. is satisfied. it is related to the resolution on the violation of good criminal records dated 04.04.02 for part 3 of article 15, part 5 of article 191, part 1 of article 208 of the CC of Ukraine; dated 04/06/02 for Part 2 of Article 366 of the Code of Ukraine; dated 04/11/02 for Part 5 of Article 191 of the Code of Ukraine; dated July 22, 2002 under Article 364 Part 2 of the CC of Ukraine, – skasuvat.
At the satisfied skarga Artemenka A.V. and yogo representative - vidmovit.
Addendum: 2 copies of the appeal.
The person who destroyed criminal records
she met the fate of the ship's inspector O.I. Donsky
In topic: Yarosh and the Right Sector. Who are we working for?
Subscribe to our channels in Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, VC — Only new faces from the section CRYPT!