The NBU, in an official statement, announced that on September 10, the Kiev Administrative Court of Appeal confirmed the “legitimacy and sufficiency of the actions of the National Bank in upgrading PJSC CB “Nadra” to the category non-payers" at the right for the call of a depositor-physician.
“Looking at the bank’s promotion to the category of problematic ones, and then to the category of defaulters, the panel of judges came to the conclusion that on the side of the National Bank they were charged with preventing the bank from being raised to categories of non-payment-promoting ones, as well as on the renewal of such payment-promoting capabilities,” according to the information to the National Bank.
It seems likely, as Finbalance wrote, based on materials from the Pechersk District Court of Kiev, that investigators from the Prosecutor General’s Office carried out a pre-trial investigation as part of a criminal investigation. No. 42015000000001200, look at the fact that the main bank “Nadra” was taken over by the evil spirit of the service camp.
Investigators of the GPU established, for certain, that in 2014, the officials of the Nadra bank withdrew from the NBU loans to save liquidity for a total amount of 3,3 billion UAH. “In the future, following the ongoing actions on the side of the bank, bringing the bank to the category of non-paying bank during the first quarter of 2015, the way of crushing the deposits of individuals and withdrawing funds legal entities, the bank's loan portfolio was changed to a total amount of more than UAH 8 billion. and 1 billion US dollars,” it was stated in the ship’s materials.
18th quarter Pechersk District Court of Kiev, having satisfied the efforts of the investigators, the Prosecutor General's Office has generously granted permission for immediate access and obtained duly certified copies of special certificates of low-income citizens to the National Bank (which are located in Volodinna they are kept at the office of the NBU at the address: Kiev, Institutska st., 9), as they prepared and approved the resolutions of the NBU board on the refinancing of PJSC “KB Nadra”.
I have the utmost respect for so many circumstances.
First of all, as of April 06, 2015, the Nadra Bank was charged 12,6 billion UAH to the NBU, or perhaps half of all financial claims. The bulk of the debt accumulated in 2008-2009. (for hours of servicing at the NBU V. Stelmakh). At the same time in Bereznya-Kvitna 2014, the National Bank praised the decision about the refinancing given to “Nadriya”, by the way - predicted 3,3 billion UAH.
Otherwise, it is not excluded that there will be a sharp change in the loan and deposit portfolio of the Nadra Bank, which occurred during the hours of care at the NBU of V. Gontareva.
Please note, “Nadra” was promoted to the category of non-payers on February 05, 2015. And having repeatedly betrayed Finbalance, in the first quarter of 2015, the amount of hryvnia loans to legal entities in the bank’s portfolio changed by UAH 6,86 billion, and foreign currency positions – by $238,7 million; obligations of foreign currency loans to individuals - by 836 million dollars, hryvnia - by 1,33 billion UAH.
In the first quarter of 2015, the volume of foreign currency deposits of Bank Nadra in the first quarter of 2015 changed by 92 times - from the maximum of 167 million dollars to 1,8 million dollars (which fell by 165,2 million dollars), and the portfolio of hryvnia deposits decreased by a maximum of 5 times - from 2,76 billion UAH up to 566 million UAH (totally by 2,2 billion UAH). And the portfolio of hryvnia fizosib deposits at Nadra Bank in the first quarter of 2015 increased by UAH 127 million...
What were the reasons for such dynamics of the loan and deposit portfolio? Assignment of rights to Vimoga? Transfer of assets and liabilities to other banks (for example, Clearing House, which is associated with Firtash’s partners)? Could the “collapse” break the bank? How to protect the loan portfolio from the reserves that would be formed under certain types of positions? What's different?... It looks like the GPU investigators were/are trying to get out.
P.S.
According to the data of the Guarantee Fund, as of September 01, 2016, depositors of Nadra Bank received compensation within the guarantee amount of UAH 3,65 billion (94,1% of the amount that supports payments).
As having written Finbalance, on the 10th of May the investigator of the Pechersk District Court of Kiev was often satisfied with the work of the investigators of the Prosecutor General's Office within the framework of the known criminal case No. 42015000000001200 and having pressed the authorities the procedure for certified copies of documents [they wanted the originals, - ed.], which are in Volodin's possession and are stored at the office of PAT "KB "Nadra" at the address: st. Sichovikh Striltsiv (Artema), 15, metro station Kiev, including “Informations about the accountability of the top managers of PJSC KB Nadra associated with the bank, the financial owners, the final beneficial owner [and he is Dmytro Firtash, - ed.] were communicated to the Nadra bank to non-payment."
Another such stroke.
The press release of the NBU dated 06 about the promotion of Nadra Bank to the category of non-payable bankers confirmed that the immediate decision became a legacy of the bank’s unavailability “even after the introduction of the time limit” administration in 2009, recognizing that it was called upon, to stop, the risky activities of the forward management along with Gilenko I. V., who failed to ensure clear management of the bank and actually pushed it into bankruptcy.”
Subscribe to our channels in Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, VC — Only new faces from the section CRYPT!