A JOKE circulating in Boryspil:
The chief police officer of the city of Boryspil was asked:
- You have a cool mobile phone, it costs 17,000 hryvnia, you probably didn’t eat or drink and saved up for it in six months?
“Yes, no,” the policeman answers, “the prosecutor awarded me!”
– Have you caught a dangerous criminal, a repeat offender?
- Yes-no, - the policeman answers, - he let him go!!!
The change in power hasn't led to any changes in the way law enforcement operates. As under Yanukovych, the prosecutor's office is enriching itself by exploiting the police. And why shouldn't N.N. Ulmer, the prosecutor of the Boryspil inter-district prosecutor's office, do the same, for example, if his mother, having been purged, continues to work and cover up her child's abuses in the Prosecutor General's Office? And we all know: no matter what the government says about cleansing, family ties are the most important thing in our country.
In Boryspil, law enforcement agencies treat entrepreneurs in a peculiar way. They were, and are, viewed as those obligated not only to obey the authorities, represented by the police and prosecutors, but also as obedient puppets for whom the district prosecutor is king and god. But entrepreneurs are not satisfied with this approach. And they seek justice.
Entrepreneur K.M. Statkevich had to deal with yet another instance of criminal activity at the hands of law enforcement in Boryspil. When he leased a plot of land to grow crops in the Boryspil district of the Kyiv region, he had no idea he would encounter complete lawlessness among law enforcement agencies in the area.
When the entrepreneur began planting trees after the lease was finalized, he was visited by a certain Dmitry, a trusted representative of the owner of a defunct gas station located next to the land leased by Statkevich at kilometer 53 of the Kyiv-Kharkiv highway in the Boryspil district. Dmitry claimed the gas station belonged to a high-ranking official in the prosecutor's office and threatened to cause problems with the prosecutor's office if Statkevich didn't vacate the adjacent land, as the actual owner, the prosecutor, intended to expand the station. The owner's representative justified his demands by claiming he had a contract for the purchase of asphalt pavement, but he did not produce any documents.
Since October 2014, vandalism and nighttime thefts have been occurring on the entrepreneur's leased land. Boryspil police ignored reports of vandalism and theft until November 3, 2014, when workers at the enterprise caught one of the gang's repeat offenders, O., with stolen property during yet another theft and handed him over to the police. The repeat offender's accomplices abandoned the stolen goods and their belongings and fled.
The day after the theft, a representative of businessman I.T. Kamenev called the police and inquired about the investigation of the nighttime theft. Imagine her surprise when a police officer informed her that the amount of damage caused to the victim must exceed 10,000 hryvnias to initiate criminal proceedings, and that the amount stolen by the thieves, 3372 hryvnias, was insignificant. Therefore, no criminal case was opened, and the police released the repeat offender, O.
Based on the police officer's interpretation, in Boryspil, one can freely steal pensions from pensioners, goods from businesses, damage property, commit vandalism, and cause damages of less than 10,000 hryvnias without being held accountable? After such an explanation, it becomes clear why, with such a police force, the number of crimes has increased over the past year! After all, city residents know: in Boryspil, the refusal of police to fulfill their official duty of filing reports in the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations (URDR) has become widespread.
Incidentally, the victims asked R.S. Kozyakov, head of the Boryspil Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, if someone breaks your car's headlights and windshield, will the culprit also not be held accountable, since the damage is less than 10,000 hryvnias? He replied that they would be held accountable! So what kind of approach is this? Does this mean the Boryspil police operate "by code" and not by Ukrainian law?
Boryspil's chief police officer, R.S. Kozyakov, ordered that witnesses not be questioned and, playing the fool, wrote a formal reply. Instead of investigating the crime, he is investigating how much unstolen property the businessman still has.
Before the entrepreneur could even send the documents in response to the police's request (the post office doesn't work at night, nor does the police office), the head of the Boryspil Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs sent the entrepreneur a response the very next day: a conclusion.
Well, you have to admit, it couldn't have been done more quickly! It turns out the Boryspil police are writing two documents at once: a request and a formal reply with a link to the request.
On November 14, 2014, the businessman was robbed again...
On November 26, 2014, Kameneva I.T. filed a complaint with the court regarding police inaction.
In the Boryspil Inter-District Court, already accustomed to crimes committed by local police officers and prosecutors, and therefore churning out decisions on violations of the law by Boryspil law enforcement officers, Judge Yu. V. Kabanyachy issues a ruling and orders the police to investigate the thefts.
The police do not investigate, Kameneva I.T. appeals to the prosecutor's office and receives a response from the Boryspil prosecutor's office about her "instructions" given to the police.
And then strange things happen: late on a December evening, after 8:00 PM, a task force arrives at the business of businessman K.M. Statkevich. But not to investigate crimes committed against Statkevich.
It turns out that Boryspil police chief R.S. Kozyakov removed investigators from the murder investigation (which they didn't even try to hide) and sent them to investigate whether businessman Statkevich was engaged in criminal activity! He thereby criminally ordered his subordinates to violate Part 2 of Article 30 of the Constitution of Ukraine, that is, to conduct investigative actions by entering private property without a reasoned court decision, grossly violating Section 2 of Article 162 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which provides for imprisonment for police officers for a term of 2 to 5 years. Why, after the Maidan, police officers continue to carry out the criminal orders of their superiors like sheep remains a mystery. A question for Prime Minister Yatsenyuk and Interior Minister Avakov... After the investigators, prosecutors arrive for an inspection. At the request of the businessman's representative, I.T. Kameneva. Show ID and a referral for inspection – they leave immediately, but then (at the request of the former head of the Boryspil district administration), the head of the Ivankov village council arrives to inspect the land use of the tenant, K.M. Statkevich! After him, it's the police again, and then the prosecutor's office again.
Meanwhile, no one is investigating the theft at Statkevich's enterprise. The man arrested for the theft had previously been released. And one gets the impression that Boryspil police released repeat offender O. not because he paid his way out of prison, but because he was carrying out "dirty work" on behalf of law enforcement.
Six months later, the Boryspil Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office is still investigating the incident and why the police released the detained criminal. Although, to put it bluntly, the Boryspil prosecutor is running a peculiar criminal enterprise, employing gangsters and... Boryspil "cops."
The editors are curious: does Avakov know what his subordinate, the head of the Boryspil Ministry of Internal Affairs, R.S. Kozyakov, is doing, or does it all boil down to an organized crime group led by the Boryspil inter-district prosecutor, N.N. Ulmer?
Subscribe to our channels in Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, VC — Only new faces from the section CRYPT!